Accepted Position Papers
The accepted position papers appear together in this volume or individually below.
- Anja Belz
- Putting development and evaluation of core technology first
- Donna Byron, Alexander Koller, Jon Oberlander, Laura Stoia and Kristina Striegnitz
- Generating Instructions in Virtual Environments (GIVE): A Challenge and an Evaluation Testbed for NLG
- Barbara Di Eugenio
- Shared Tasks and Comparative Evaluation for NLG: to go ahead, or not to go ahead?
- Albert Gatt, Ielka van der Sluis and Kees van Deemter
- Corpus-based evaluation of Referring Expressions Generation
- Nancy L. Green
- Position Statement for Workshop on STEC in NLG
- Kathleen F. McCoy
- To Share a Task or Not: Some Ramblings from a Mad (i.e., crazy) NLGer
- David McDonald
- Flexibility counts more than precision
- Chris Mellish and Donia Scott
- NLG Evaluation: Let's open up the box
- Cécile Paris, Nathalie Colineau and Ross Wilkinson
- NLG Systems Evaluation: a framework to measure impact on and cost for all stakeholders
- Ehud Reiter
- NLG Shared Tasks: Lets try it and see what happens
- Vasile Rus, Zhiqiang Cai and Arthur C. Graesser
- Evaluation in Natural Language Generation: The Question Generation Task
- Donia Scott and Johanna Moore
- An NLG evaluation competition? Eight Reasons to be Cautious
- Amanda Stent
- Pragmatic Influences on Sentence Planning and Surface Realization: Implications for Evaluation
- Jette Viethen
- Automatic Evaluation of Referring Expression Generation Is Possible
- Marilyn Walker
- Share and Share Alike: Resources for Language Generation
