Testing if Washoe had acquired Syntax (Gardner & Gardner, 1975)
"Our strategy has been to obtain observations of the acquisition of sign language by young chimpanzees that can be compared with observations of the acquisition of spoken languages and sign languages by human children...If the children can be said to have acquired language on the basis of their performance, then the chimpanzees can be said to have acquired language to the extent that their performance matches that of the children."
Syntactic test: ask Washoe a variety of wh-questions
Tabulate percentage of responses of "correct grammatical category"
Responses only had to be grammatically, and not factually, correct
7 Limited analysis to relevant categories
7 Ignored repetitions
| Question | Target | Example (Q) | Example (R) | Correct/Total |
| Who pronoun? | Proper Name | Who you? | Me Washoe | 49/50 |
| Who action? | Pr. Name/PRO | Who smoke? | You smoke | 45/50 |
| Who trait? | Pr. Name/PRO | Who good? | Good me | 32/50 |
| Whose PRO? | Possessive | Whose that? | Mine | 45/50 |
| What color? | Color | What color? | Bird white | 47/50 |
| What PRO? | Common noun | What that? | Book | 50/50 |
| What now? | Verb | What now? | Tickle | 44/50 |
| What want? | Noun/Verb | What want? | Want berry | 41/50 |
| Where action? | Locative | Where we go? | Out | 38/50 |
| Where object? | Locative | Where shoe? | There shoe | 24/43 |
Washoe's responses compared favorably to those of two year-old children, who gave responses of the correct grammatical category 50% of the time.