Notes for February 4th and 11th Meetings:

Part 1: Well I g-

Some transcribers argued for an ip boundary between WELL and I, but they assigned different break indexes:

• 3 = expected sense of disjuncture and clear tonal fall.
• 2 = weaker sense of disjuncture than expected, but clear tonal fall.

Transcribers disagreed about whether WELL and I are both accented.

Transcribers also disagreed about whether the speaker restarts the IP following the dysfluency. Some transcribers argued that the local prominence on WENT indicates restart, but others argued that the local prominence was unremarkable given the rest of the utterance.

Part 2: went out one morning and I saw all around

As often happens, transcribers disagreed about whether the rises at WENT and AROUND sound like (and look like) H* or L+H*.

Transcribers similarly disagreed about the extent to which the phrase accents at MORNING (!H vs L-) and AROUND (H- vs !H-) fall.

In addition, not everyone agreed that there was the expected sense of disjuncture for the ip (i.e., 3- instead of 3). Indeed, one transcriber observed that perhaps there is no ip boundary at AROUND IT given that there was a temporary garden path effect in which IT was parsed as the object of the preposition AROUND.

Part 3: it was like on the back bumper

Some transcribers heard downstep from BACK to BUMPER, but others did not. Those who did not transcribe downstep did mark a delayed F0 peak in BUMPER.

Part 4: of the Honda too

Everyone agreed that TOO is in its own ip, and most transcribers heard a sequence of L+H* accents.